December 2, 2016
Posted by on
The “G-word” has recently come up in regards to the escalation of mass violence currently taking place in Burma. The perpetrators, ethnic Buddhist Rahkine, began attacking Burma’s Muslim minority, the Rohingya, in early October in response to militant attacks on police outposts. It does not appear that the group is acting under the authority of Aung San Suu Kyi, but it’s obvious the Burmese government is most definitely not doing anything to stop it. Several indicators of genocide developed by past scholars have been evidenced in the war-torn Rahkine State, some of which include “the systematic dehumanization of the target group”, “their isolation inside camps and barricaded ghettos”, and “violent attacks on them involving the participation of security forces”. Oddly familiar, don’t you think? The Wall Street Journal has, in a recent article, pointed out the
unnerving similarities between the aspects of this event and the hallmarks of tragedies like those in Bosnia, Darfur, Kosovo, and Rwanda.
January 25, 2014
Posted by on
Recent attacks on the Rohingyas in the Rhakine state of Myanmar (also known as Burma) highlight many of the difficulties the country and the international community continue to face as Myanmar transitions from decades of military rule to democracy. According to recent BBC and Radio Free Asia articles, there is strong evidence that more than 40 Rohingya Muslims were killed, in two “serious” incidents of violence between January 9th and 13th. At least 40 Rohingya Muslims, including men, women, and children, were killed in Du Chee Yar Tan village by local police and ethnic Rakhines Buddhists. These attacks are one of many incidents of sectarian violence that have flared up since 2012.
Myanmar began its transition from 50 years of military rule to democracy in 2011, and has since then experienced rapidly evolving reforms, according to the International Centre for Transitional Justice. However, incidents as the one noted above, highlight the difficulty of holding individuals accountable for past and current human rights violations. This is especially troubling when local officials are often instigating local violence. It is a troubling dilemma for the international community; how does one hold a transitioning government accountable for human rights abuses without upsetting the progress it has made towards democracy?